Well, that was a waste of time.

[kellinator]

For my own curiosity, I just took the Match.com "What do you find attractive?" test and boy, was that a waste of time.

The test informed me that I'm very picky and only like matinee-idol looks. Well, did it occur to you that maybe you should have included more diverse pictures? I didn't see many pictures of the geeky boys I always crush on, and in fact, when in the results it showed two pictures and labeled them "most conventionally attractive guy you picked" and "least conventionally attractive guy you picked," I found the "least" far more attractive in all cases.

I'm just pissed because I feel like the test gave me shallow options and then bitched at me for giving shallow answers. I know it was pretty accurate for some of you, but just about the only thing it got right for me was that I like angular features.

Of course, now I'm stuck with the uncomfortable feeling that maybe I really am shallow...

Comments

[daraflower.livejournal.com]

you know suicidegirls.com, with all the sexy hot naked counterculture punky/alternachicks? mmmm... well what they need now is suicideboys. so much of the suicidegirls' sex appeal is their witty, geeky, irreverent familiarity... they look like girls you went to school with. you just don't meet people like that unless you go to clubs or work on a college campus... *ponders*