For the record...
Aug. 20th, 2004 04:58 pmApparently I am not as clear a writer as I hoped I was. I do not know how people are getting the idea that I think MIT should be dumbed down. Nor am I suggesting that students should be coddled and babied. My points are twofold. Let me spell them out in black and white (or purple, as the case may be in my LJ):
- Refusing someone a position they are qualified for on no basis other than the fact that they have issues with mental health such as antidepressants or therapy is discrimination, pure and simple.
- Institutions that provide physical health care (such as employers and universities) should have a moral, ethical, and in my opinion legal obligation to provide mental health care as well.
I would like to add, though this is more of an opinion than a firm belief, that the high-stress pressure-cooker environment so prevalent in our society, especially at the top universities and pretty much any sector that is high-powered, does little to increase productivity or knowledge, probably contributes to the sort of mental problems that cost billions each year in lost productivity, and to boot turns people into insufferable raging assholes.
EDIT:
no subject
Date: 2004-08-20 03:43 pm (UTC)In this particular case, it's most likely an "all mental health conditions are bad, mmmkay?" attitude. For example, just seeing a psychologist is enough to cause a major headache (you can still be certified, but it involves a letter from the psychologist stating that you are fit, and your case has to be reviewed by the FAA chief medical examiner's office).
This has become a fairly major issue in the past couple of years, and there's been quite a bit of lobbying for the FAA to change the rules with regards to conditions like depression.