![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm probably going to get flamed for this. Ah, screw it.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/06/03/music.country.reut/index.html
Gist of the article: Now the Dixie Chicks are in trouble because Natalie Maines wore a shirt with the letters "F.U.T.K." to an awards show. Everyone interpreted this as "fuck you Toby Keith." Apparently the two have been in a feud since Maines criticized Keith's song "Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue (The Angry American)" (which for my money is a dreadful, embarrassing song, but that's not the point). Keith has therefore stated that Maines isn't nearly as good a songwriter as he is (of course not, he's a man), and has taken to "showing on big screens behind the stage [in his concerts] the doctored photo of Maines and Saddam Hussein."
Now, I'm not denying that the shirt stunt was just stupid, but it's so country music to criticize a woman for responding in kind to an accusation of treason. *slap* Now get in the kitchen and make me some pie!!
Stuff like this makes it embarrassing to be from the South. (You know why the South has started going heavy Republican? I'll tell you in one word: racism. And if you're Republican and you're offended by that, I'm sorry, but you're the ones who let Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms, and Trent Lott speak for yourselves. Aren't you guys the ones who insist you're judged by the company you keep? If you want to be well thought-of, then it's up to you to take control of your party back from the "disagreement is treason" jingoists.)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/06/03/music.country.reut/index.html
Gist of the article: Now the Dixie Chicks are in trouble because Natalie Maines wore a shirt with the letters "F.U.T.K." to an awards show. Everyone interpreted this as "fuck you Toby Keith." Apparently the two have been in a feud since Maines criticized Keith's song "Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue (The Angry American)" (which for my money is a dreadful, embarrassing song, but that's not the point). Keith has therefore stated that Maines isn't nearly as good a songwriter as he is (of course not, he's a man), and has taken to "showing on big screens behind the stage [in his concerts] the doctored photo of Maines and Saddam Hussein."
Now, I'm not denying that the shirt stunt was just stupid, but it's so country music to criticize a woman for responding in kind to an accusation of treason. *slap* Now get in the kitchen and make me some pie!!
Stuff like this makes it embarrassing to be from the South. (You know why the South has started going heavy Republican? I'll tell you in one word: racism. And if you're Republican and you're offended by that, I'm sorry, but you're the ones who let Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms, and Trent Lott speak for yourselves. Aren't you guys the ones who insist you're judged by the company you keep? If you want to be well thought-of, then it's up to you to take control of your party back from the "disagreement is treason" jingoists.)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 10:15 am (UTC)(and i lived enough of my life in the south to have some credibility on the issue, even if i did manage to escape a couple years ago...)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 09:44 am (UTC)Alot of women in the south are still seen as the "don't speak until spoken to", "get in the kitchen and get me a beer", can't do anything for themselves type of people by a good many men.
In Maines' case, she's also now been painted as unpatriotic and anti-American... which, is only adding reasons for people to hate her and the group.
Notice Toby didn't get any repercussions at all when he stooped to the childish levels of using the doctored photographs and stating that she wasn't of "his level" in talent. For as much as I liked his music, it is food for thought before buying another cd... Just my $.02
no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 12:26 pm (UTC)Uppity women-folk
Date: 2003-06-03 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 10:14 am (UTC)Ahh, thanks for the smile. I'm not from the south, but I agree entirely. I've even got a couple people on my friends list that were throwing around the treason crap, though they've piped down considerably since the "war" ended. Really makes my blood boil. Aside from that, I'm also really tired of:
I'm sure I'll think of 5 or 6 more after I hit "submit"
Yay!
Date: 2003-06-03 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 12:00 pm (UTC)Wow, he's such a fine example of a Southern gentleman. :P I used to like Toby Keith back when I listened to country regularly. For shame.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-03 04:31 pm (UTC)Yeah, he's such an awesome example!
Re:
Date: 2003-06-04 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-04 05:41 am (UTC)Hehehe... Tracy Lawrence, Toby Keith... I wonder how many other stars have a record for beating women. *shakes head*
*puts his foot down*
Date: 2003-06-04 11:45 am (UTC)History, as a matter of fact, states otherwise.
Allow me to use the WayBack machine and go back to just before the Civil War.
Just before the Civil War, when the Congress of the time was talking about state's rights and slavery and what not, there was also this HUGE debate on cotton taxes. Summary: Northern politicos were in favor of taxation, the Southerners were not.
When the legislation came down in favor of cotton taxation, this added a ton of fuel to the North/South difference issues.
So, if you ask historians, you will find that that Civil War was mainly about state's rights and taxation, with slavery as a sidebar issue.
Flash-forward to the Reconstruction period.
The South is under martial law, and the political entities being established were primarily Republican in nature - Lincoln's party. These were the carpetbaggers.
Since the Republicans were liberals at the time, the Southerners [when able to] began to vote again for the conservatives of the day - the Democratic party. The Democratic party at the time also DID NOT favor taxation; their platform on economics was similar to the Republican party of today
Flash-forward to the New Deal.
With the introduction of FDR on the side of the Democratic party and the creating of the ABC programs, the Democratic party became increasingly more prone to taxation and government intervention in business.
The Republican party, of course, began to swing the opposite way, and eventually became the friend of Big Business.
The Southern Democrats remained conservative, because that's what their constituents were. Also, the remaining bitterness of the South towards the Republican party kept the people from voting for Republicans.
This led to the well-known rift in the Democratic party, where it was generally regarded that a Democratic senator from GA held the same beliefs as a Republican senator from MA - and this was mostly true.
Flash-forward to NOW.
With the influx of Westerners and Yankees to the South, and the decrease in the whole Southern bitterness towards the Republican Party, the constituents are now showing their colors.
They were and are in favor of less taxation and less government intervention - especially in the rural areas, which composes 85% of the South.
Thus they vote for the Republican party, as the Democratic party as a whole does not represent their interests.
The entire racial thing is wholly beside the point.
As a matter of fact, the North, on average is more racist than the South ever was.
Why?
Look at the pattern of where race riots have occurred, and in what frequency.
Look at the Yankee habit of segregating Caucasians in neighborhoods by their former nationality, instead of the general integration found in the South.
If you require more information, check this article here (http://www.etymonline.com/cw/northrace.htm).
As it is, you do make an excellent point about the extremists in the Republican party. I should also point out that those same extremists exist in the Democratic party.