Nancy J. Skifstad has never been afraid to sign her posts, unlike those of you who are still using "nicknames".
Kelli Ann (or has she decided to be Kelly Ann this week?) Parker and those "nice enough" to make sure I got all the added posts know my signature by now. The massive number of email's I got from an expired account proves that.
Only comment worth following up on -- A paid subscriber does not get kicked out of LJ. I took my account down because of exactly the type of commentary. Why should I spend $25 when I get this on my other 5 LJ accounts for free?
Remember rule one about LJ -- ANYONE can post, ANYTHING they want, and you take the good comments with the bad. Signed, or unsigned, truth or not truth. And believe me, from the commentary generated here, it still amazes me how much lying still goes on in this forum.
One question, "Nancy J. Skifstad" - if you no longer even have a valid account with LJ, why are you stalking Kelly? How pathetic must your life be that you log onto LJ just to harass another person?
I mean, you sit there and try to tell us how bad Kelly is... well, WE POST AND READ KELLY'S JOURNAL BECAUSE WE LIKE HER!
She has FRIENDS who will defend her... who will stand up for her...
And I can tell you hate that! Maybe if you spent your time improving yourself and not being bitter over people you are really jealous of, then you would HAVE FRIENDS for GOD'S SAKE!
Well woman, if you are so big and tough, don't post anonomously, and GET OVER YOUR OBSESSION WITH KELLY! Geez, you are over 40, grow up and get your own life!
Your claim to have 5 LJ accounts (and who the heck needs 5 of them, anyway?) doesn't ring very true since you aren't posting from one of them.
Good luck in getting enough of a life on your own that you don't need to fill your days by reading the journal of someone you obviously cannot stand.
I do hope you aren't the Nancy Skifstad who is involved with the Unitarian Universalist Metro Atlanta North congregation. If so, you need to step back and look at those UU principles again.
Nancy J. Skifstad, Systems Librarian Roswell Library Kimberly-Clark Corporation Roswell GA Email (work): skifstad@kcc.com Email (home): nanbear@mindspring.com Organization's page: http://www.kimberly-clark.com/
Yes, people can technically say anything they like in their own LiveJournals and in comments left on other people's LJs. And they can be held responsible for what they say, as well. If you make threats of harm, Kell can report you through your ISP. If you're still with MindSpring, they do take such things seriously. If you're posting from work, most employers look very dimly on employees who misuse their net connections in that manner. And yes, LJ does kick people off - including people with paid accounts - if they violate the Terms of Service here. I know of cases in which it has happened.
If you make or have made threats of physical harm (and if Kell has saved the evidence from past communications), I'll personally help her get the police involved. (Did I mention that I'm an online safety advocate?)
Signatures?
Date: 2002-06-11 01:54 am (UTC)Kelli Ann (or has she decided to be Kelly Ann this week?) Parker and those "nice enough" to make sure I got all the added posts know my signature by now. The massive number of email's I got from an expired account proves that.
Only comment worth following up on -- A paid subscriber does not get kicked out of LJ. I took my account down because of exactly the type of commentary. Why should I spend $25 when I get this on my other 5 LJ accounts for free?
Remember rule one about LJ -- ANYONE can post, ANYTHING they want, and you take the good comments with the bad. Signed, or unsigned, truth or not truth. And believe me, from the commentary generated here, it still amazes me how much lying still goes on in this forum.
Nancy J. Skifstad
Re: Signatures?
Date: 2002-06-11 03:51 am (UTC)Do please grow up and get lost.
Re: Signatures?
Date: 2002-06-11 07:19 am (UTC)I mean, you sit there and try to tell us how bad Kelly is... well, WE POST AND READ KELLY'S JOURNAL BECAUSE WE LIKE HER!
She has FRIENDS who will defend her... who will stand up for her...
And I can tell you hate that! Maybe if you spent your time improving yourself and not being bitter over people you are really jealous of, then you would HAVE FRIENDS for GOD'S SAKE!
Well woman, if you are so big and tough, don't post anonomously, and GET OVER YOUR OBSESSION WITH KELLY! Geez, you are over 40, grow up and get your own life!
Re: Signatures?
Date: 2002-06-11 08:36 am (UTC)Your claim to have 5 LJ accounts (and who the heck needs 5 of them, anyway?) doesn't ring very true since you aren't posting from one of them.
Good luck in getting enough of a life on your own that you don't need to fill your days by reading the journal of someone you obviously cannot stand.
I do hope you aren't the Nancy Skifstad who is involved with the Unitarian Universalist Metro Atlanta North congregation. If so, you need to step back and look at those UU principles again.
I can see it as more likely that this is or was you, listed at http://www.sla.org/division/dite/pages.html:
Nancy J. Skifstad, Systems Librarian
Roswell Library
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Roswell GA
Email (work): skifstad@kcc.com
Email (home): nanbear@mindspring.com
Organization's page: http://www.kimberly-clark.com/
Yes, people can technically say anything they like in their own LiveJournals and in comments left on other people's LJs. And they can be held responsible for what they say, as well. If you make threats of harm, Kell can report you through your ISP. If you're still with MindSpring, they do take such things seriously. If you're posting from work, most employers look very dimly on employees who misuse their net connections in that manner. And yes, LJ does kick people off - including people with paid accounts - if they violate the Terms of Service here. I know of cases in which it has happened.
If you make or have made threats of physical harm (and if Kell has saved the evidence from past communications), I'll personally help her get the police involved. (Did I mention that I'm an online safety advocate?)
Re: Signatures?
Date: 2002-06-11 11:04 am (UTC)