kellinator: (clipboard)
[personal profile] kellinator
I have a lot of hacker friends, many of whom seem to be personally offended by the existence of books, or "dead trees" as they derisively call them. They take great joy in announcing that books will be obsolete in five years and we'll wonder why we ever wasted time with the damn things.

As a bookworm, this attitude has always bothered me. I know few pleasures as glorious as taking a shiny new book, running your hands over it, smelling that new-book smell, and settling into bed for an evening of reading. I just don't believe you can get the same aesthetic pleasure from your e-book reader, no matter how convenient it is.

But as a librarian and document delivery specialist, I can say one thing for damn sure: Books will never be obsolete as long as there are all these damn broken links on the web.

(I will add that generally, government websites are the worst offenders, and have the least user-friendly websites to boot.)

Date: 2003-03-10 08:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deza.livejournal.com
They're just jealous that we can get a new book fix for under $30. ;)

Date: 2003-03-10 08:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vill.livejournal.com
Book-reading is a tactile experience. Fie on those who say it can be achieved through data and a screen.
From: [identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com
As techie as I am, I still love the feel of a book. I like the feel of the paper, the heft of the book, the sometimes smell. All of these thing contribute a lot. It's much harder to damage a book and the type and the cover are so much clearer. Give me a book anyday. Well, maybe not; we don't have enough room already. :)

Date: 2003-03-10 09:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dslartoo.livejournal.com
Bah. There will *always* be a market for printed books, because those of us who love to read will always demand them. There's nothing like lounging on the couch with a good book and spending the entire afternoon reading. It just isn't the same reading it on a screen.

Also: printed books are portable, dammit. Fuck your laptops, I'd rather be able to just tuck something underneath my arm or carry it in one hand.

cheers,
Phil

Date: 2003-03-10 09:01 am (UTC)
technomom: (Default)
From: [personal profile] technomom
I'm a geek. I'm not giving up my books. So there.

Date: 2003-03-10 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leezechka.livejournal.com
I think if I bent a computer back in the way I bend a paperback, or spilled coffee on it for that matter, reading would get way too expensive. and nothing can compare too that old book smell either.

Date: 2003-03-10 10:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bethynyc.livejournal.com
You can't read a computer screen in the bathtub.

Bethy the Biblioholic

Date: 2003-03-10 10:39 am (UTC)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
From: [personal profile] azurelunatic
I am personally offended by any given document not existing both paper-wise and electronically, for I love both.

Date: 2003-03-10 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerlilly.livejournal.com
I agree! Personally, I don't think I would be comfortable reading a book on a computer. Besides, books have been around for AGES, they won't go away.

Date: 2003-03-10 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vestalvixen.livejournal.com
Geeks vs. Nerds. A struggle as old as Cain and ABel. No I don't know what I'm talking about, but it sounded good.

Profile

kellinator: (Default)
kellinator

July 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617 181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 11:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios