kellinator (
kellinator) wrote2005-03-18 03:21 pm
We are so screwed.
George Lucas is describing Revenge of the Sith as "Titanic in space."
I already want my nine bucks back, and I haven't even spent it yet.
(using this icon because Peter Jackson pwns George Lucas)
I already want my nine bucks back, and I haven't even spent it yet.
(using this icon because Peter Jackson pwns George Lucas)
no subject
no subject
Gee, I wonder if that Anakin boy's gonna make it out okay? Take bets?
*thwaps Lucas*
*thwaps self in advance for seeing the movie, as I am a sheep*
no subject
*trailer comes on right before Robots*
Me: *cussing a blue streak* rassafrasa muthafuka Lucas...
*after the trailer*
Me: *cussing harder*
Friend: Why are you so upset?
Me: I'm getting sodomised by a franchise!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Argh
no subject
no subject
Everyone who has seen the original "Star Wars" knows Mace is right. That film opens in a dark, oppressive age a couple of decades after the action of "Revenge of the Sith"...
um... Luke is like 17/18... so it's UNDER 20 years... that's not a couple decades the dumb jerk.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Far...
WhereEVER you are...
no subject
because Peter Jackson pwns George Lucas
You took the words right outta my mouth.
no subject
no subject
no subject
T and I are all "should we see it in the theater?" "Dunno. It'll suck. A lot." "Yeah, but it's Star Wars. Kinda." "Star Wars lite." Either one of us say these things interchangably.
T hates going to the movies. He hates the people and (he says) the sticky floors. Plus it is harder for him to hear in the theater cause he's almost totally deaf in one ear. (Hey, kids, don't spend a concert next to the speaker on stage, mmmkay?) But it is Star Wars. Kinda. If you reallllly stretch it.
no subject
= )
no subject
Yeah, that seems about right..
oh wait you meant the movie titanic? no, sorry george, I actually liked that movie.
no subject
yes, I am pathetic.
no subject
no subject
If not, then well, I'll still end up seeing it anyway, just won't be as pleased.
-jsh
no subject
-hx
no subject
-HX
no subject
no subject
-HX, I don't think people are quite ready for movies where everything gets destroyed in graphic slow motion again...
no subject
I mean, for cryin' out loud! Hayden Christiansen made me shriek with pain every time he opened his mouth, and Lucas kept him for the third movie! Natalie Portman, who is a good actress when she has something to work with, was cast adrift! Even Ewan McGregor, even LIAM FUCKING NEESON, had trouble delivering! Why? Because the directing was for shit, that is why. The director did not, and does not, care about acting or actors at all. Lucas has said on many occasions that if he could, he would make movies without actors. No, Lucas has his hardon for special effects, the flashier the better. What's that? Realism? Fitting with the story? Who cares!
I would say PJ owns Lucas' ass, but I don't think he'd want it.
no subject
Other than that, no. *shakes head with as little effort as possible*
no subject
no subject
no subject
Are you fucking high?
-hx
no subject
Come oooon! Come ooon! Dead Alive was hilarious because it was sooo bad. Just like the original Evil Dead movies.
no subject
-HX
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject