kellinator (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
kellinator) wrote2002-05-30 09:49 am
kellinator) wrote2002-05-30 09:49 am
I figured it out...
Why I hate Britney Spears so damn much:
That little tramp makes her money off the sexualization of children. She is making Lolita an acceptable fantasy, not the sick pedophilia that it is. She does this to compensate for her utter lack of talent. In the meantime, she practices all sorts of hypocrisy, primly claiming she'll wait till she's married to have sex while bragging to Cosmopolitan about the time Justin put rose petals on their bed. And she smokes -- a singer who smokes. How stupid can you get?
I have a feeling that she is contributing to a rise in the sexual abuse of children.
That little tramp makes her money off the sexualization of children. She is making Lolita an acceptable fantasy, not the sick pedophilia that it is. She does this to compensate for her utter lack of talent. In the meantime, she practices all sorts of hypocrisy, primly claiming she'll wait till she's married to have sex while bragging to Cosmopolitan about the time Justin put rose petals on their bed. And she smokes -- a singer who smokes. How stupid can you get?
I have a feeling that she is contributing to a rise in the sexual abuse of children.
no subject
God, I really need to stop listening to Art Bell at work.
no subject
no subject
???
Re: ???
no subject
If she had some talent (like say, Christina Aguilera, who I'm not a huge fan of but is talented), I might actually have a smidgen of respect for her.
And I'd venture to guess that she's at least partially responsible for Abercrombie & Fitch making thongs for pre-teens.
no subject
I hate Abercrombie and Fitch. And I'm convinced thongs were invented by a misogynist.
no subject
(What were they thinking??!?! It's not the thong part that bothers me as much as the fact that these panties said things like "wink wink" and "eye candy" on them. If you put those same phrases on full-coverage childrens underwear, I'd still be angry. And if someone came out with childrens-size thongs in plain utilitarian white/pink/powder blue three-packs like normal girls underwear comes in, I'd be less likely to jump on it as sexualization of children.
Thongs for grown-ups=comfortable!
(Look at it this way: Normal underwear moves around, and when it gets into a wedgie, there's a fair amount of fabric there, and it's uncomfortable. With a good thong, there's only a tiny bit of fabric between your cheeks and it stays put. Where you put it in the morning is where it stays all day long.)
no subject
Spears *isn't* a virgin.
Her ex Justin Timberlake was heard on a crowded flight (when they were still together) talking about her and how she is definitely NOT a virgin. Taking into account the fact that guys brag all the time, I'm still more inclined to believe him.
Virgin or whore? My money's on the latter.
cheers,
Phil
Re: Spears *isn't* a virgin.
no subject
U'mm I'm not so sure she sings. Look at a pepsi comercial, dancing around like that most people can barly keep their breath much less belt out a song. I think she sings in a studio, it gets a lot of polish and then she lip syncs to the recording.
no subject
(That's something else that pisses me off about her!!)
Re:
no subject
no subject
Re:
no subject
no subject
Re:
no subject
Britney is definitely not twelve.
I do think she _uses_ the little girl image (ref: baby one more time video, anyone?) but you can't call her a true Lolita -- she's been legal and she was legal in most states when she started singing.
for the morbidly curious
no subject
no subject